独家优惠奖金 100% 高达 1 BTC + 180 免费旋转

The Soros Saga

This is the written version of the Soros Saga project I did with Brittany Pettibone.

First off — here’s a forward note from her:

Round and round we go. Our infinite loop of insanity. Nice of you to invite me back Brittany.

The main reason this video is happening in the first place is that when we were editing our last video about Soros and DefendEurope together, I had rewritten the entire Soros section from scratch. I showed it to Brittany and insisted we refilm it. She was able to talk me down from that, but also she liked what I had presented enough to basically justify doing an entirely separate video on it instead.

Most people have never even heard of Soros. If they have, it’s usually written off as some sort of myth or conspiracy. But he’s an actual person funding actual groups. What he does manipulates and twists the balance of the world in a way that’s technically legal under current law. **George Soros believes money shapes culture.** In the United States, he funnels it through his organizations to influence the reporting of the New York Times, Newsweek, and NBC. It’s a seemingly elaborate operation designed to buy influence among political leaders and smear his enemies. If a politician doesn’t fall in line with Soros, he cuts off their funding. In the 2016 Presidential Elections, Soros dumped all his money into Hillary Clinton and ended up losing a ton of cash after she lost to Trump. George is able to get around campaign finance laws and move chess pieces around like big businesses used to.

And that’s the sort of gusto rhetoric he practices around the world.

All it takes is a little extra elbow grease to understand the ins-and-outs of his empire.

It’s a battle of two definitions.

“But the fight against Satan is a Christian duty. Yes, I speak of an attack by Satan, who is also the angel of denial, because they are denying what they are preparing to do — even when it is completely obvious. They frantically try to prove that there is no [refugee] quota, there is no compulsory settlement, and the Soros Plan does not exist,” Aradszki noted.

When asked by Britain’s Independent newspaper to elaborate on that passage, Soros said, “It is a sort of disease when you consider yourself some kind of god, the creator of everything, but I feel comfortable about it now since I began to live it out.”

I won’t sugarcoat this or lie to anyone watching. George Soros is the man at the center of shaping world events and their direction. Politics, economics, technology. He wants the final word on it all. For too long now, the public has been doing this dance around embracing this discussion. We’ve made spooky conspiracy videos with an ominous atmosphere. What that does is turn away the common man from looking at the presented facts. They write it off. Push Soros out of their minds and focus on their own day to day lives. Those lucky few that manage to see the truths within what’s presented, face other problems. More often than not, they either submit to the inevitability and powerlessness of it all. What can they do? In the face of global politics, those people see how futile it’d be to act.

The LA Times article had one more noteworthy thing.

The best way to understand George Soros is by looking at his roots.

Understanding how Soros became one of the most powerful men in the world starts with his birth.

By age 6 he became George Soros. This was partially done in an effort by his family to hide their Jewish background. His name means “George will fly high” in Esperanto. George’s father was into the freedom from nationalities and Open Society leanings himself. He was a prisoner of war in Russia who lived through the Russian revolution and escaped. George’s parents were rich and affluent. “My father does not work. He just makes money,” A young Soros answered to people who asked what his father did.

Referring to the Elder Soros:

George’s father saw the incoming Nazi advancement and knew takeover was inevitable. So he bribed a government official to take George Soros in and pretend he was his Christian godson. To keep him safe from the Nazi occupation. It also taught George to be something else than who he actually was. Obscure the truth.

This is an often contested part of the discussion when talking about George Soros. People assume he was a Nazi collaborator in a more official sense than the actual circumstances. As far as we know, George wasn’t some sort of killing machine hellbent on serving Hitler’s will. His family came under the same wave of Nazi attacks as the rest of their country. However, it’s certainly unusual that Soros doesn’t have the typical reaction of grief and regret for having to witness such monstrosities take place in his homeland. Even more so, given the fact he had some role to play in carrying that fear out.

Boiled down: Humans are inherently flawed. The truth of social matters (political systems, stock markets, love) is unobtainable. People have a biased view of social events and it’s faulty by design. Human thought changes the state of the world, operating in an uncertain and reflexive state. It’s the Empiricism philosophy which reduces people to identical units of economic production.

Soros doesn’t balance the world, he imbalances it. And that’s something we’ll come to understand by going over his business career in hedge funds.

Ol’ George thought the global economy was falling apart. That the world needed regulation protections to stop people like Soros. Nelson Mandela once called George and asked how to protect South Africa from people like him. That’s the two feuding sides within George Soros. He’s got the cold-hard capitalist side, believing being an economist is an immoral activity. His opposite side is the philanthropist who knows money is a responsibility and tries to do right by it.

But to be honest it was a power move. George ain’t no saint either.

This is where we begin to see George’s priorities and view on the world change.

Yet despite this new lease on life, Soros was still the finances man too. While there’s a full money management team, George’s ideas and beliefs are a driving force. He doesn’t believe success is between right and wrong, it’s about doing things right on a large scale. George exploits holes in the system, specializing in situations where normal rules shift. Things like war and turmoil. The Internet seemed as revolutionary as the printing press. Global markets served as Soros’s laboratory to experiment in.

Sources involved with the Quantum Fund back then said Soros had a hand in this. He reportedly bet $1 billion against the baht, kickstarting the crisis as a result.

These color revolutions have a common trait of extended longevity beyond the normal. Somehow, they’re sustained by a continuous outside source of fuel and funding. What matters here is Soros used his wealth to start a foundation that gave him political access in numerous places around the world.

To demonstrate the extent of that, next we’ll look at George’s involvement in and around the United States.

The most prominent of these was a pattern of George’s political strategy:

THE PATTERN

We can apply this to the United States on a wider scale.

That means we can totally trust them on this:

McCain-Feingold 2002 led to 501(c)3 (and other aforementioned groups) boom, and that’s what Soros is a pro at controlling.

4.) Provoke an Election Crisis: OSI funded ACORN to shake confidence in the vote. The Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now makes up that acronym. They’re focused on getting as many people signed up to vote as possible, along with other social issues like gun control and health care.

They call this technique “top down, bottom up.” Top down means getting people riled up for widespread chaos. Bottom up is using that chaos to make people believe they need change.

You can see how these 5 different dynamics start feeding into each other.

There’s no need to further prove Bill/Hillary’s relationship with Soros. We can state their fondness for one another as fact.

*sad trombone*

It’s definitely more than that for the election’s total. He didn’t put all his cash into just Hillary. Besides, $10 million is like pocket change to ol’ George.

These are the sorts of questions worth asking, as you’ll see it’s a significant factor in how George Soros operates.

Why bring this up? It’s a prime example of how George interacts with systems of government. It plays back into the shaping realities thing that Soros is into doing. George spent twice as much cash changing political landscapes compared to Hillary’s campaign. It reveals the true motivations on why Soros cares about migration. It’s all about getting them in voting booths.

This was a big deal at the time. As Wikileaks documents show, Hillary and Soros were close.

This is the only Wikileaks bit I’m going to go over in this piece. The chances of more examples somewhere in these messages are high, though. That particular exchange is an exception because of the media attention it received.

So the answer of “Does Soros fund Anti-fa?” is more of a yes than no.

U.S. government had a century and a half before Soros was even born to develop their institutions. Harder for Soros to infiltrate. In Europe, it’s different because George was around and in a place of power as the European Union was born. Next, we’ll go over how this works with the Open Society and what all this means.

Any respect towards traditions is something that George sees as blocking his path. What is that path? Soros thinks of European countries as temporary agreements. Ol’ George believes being loyal to one’s country is crazy talk. This Open Society dream of his is a utopian globalist paradise. What’s at stake with the European migrant crisis is a country’s sense of history and culture. Soros would prefer to tear down religion and shape the education system away from valuing it.

Things make more sense if you shift your thinking on what Soros and the Open Society Foundation are. What they define as philanthropy work is actually more of a sort of political activism. The former focuses on helping people, while the latter focuses on persuading politicians.

How I’m going to approach talking about Europe is starting and ending with Hungary.

This type of institution fosters a sense of obligation for these people to act on George’s behalf. You’ll see later on an example of this. Of Soros supporting a politician’s education as a point of consideration. It’s almost guaranteed given the curriculum of CEU’s classrooms. Agendas consisting of the Open Society philosophies, shaping and brainwashing minds. With teaching staff *who as well* come from places of political power across Europe. That type of authority can command a student’s admiration with little difficulty.

This all adds up to the Soros methodologies explored earlier. Viktor Orban knows what he’s talking about. This is because he got a Soros scholarship to study at Oxford back in ‘89.

George frames the argument that makes it sound like his solutions are the only way forward. He calls for infrastructure reform in European countries to accommodate this supposed inevitability. George says Obama requested US companies in a call to action to help deal with forced migration.

These companies all met up together at the UN to discuss their plans. Soros explained they’d be working with the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees and the International Rescue Committee every step of the way.

That right there shows the political entanglement of this situation. But we’re just getting started, Brittany.

The particular paper makes special mention of Soros.

The Open Society Foundation has a hyperfocus on protecting their own reputation. Reason being is their popularity is the only way this EU system of influence is able to work. OSI’s constant coordination with foundations and NGO groups lays the pressure on. The Foundation expects EU politicians to show obedience to OSI’s values. If they don’t they suffer social shaming and other consequences like ostracization.

So what we have here in OSI is a powerful middle-man keeping a close eye on the EU. The Foundation rolls back NGO laws they don’t think are beneficial to them. While at the same time calling for the most favorable working conditions possible. Also, OSI wants direct cash funding for NGOs and civil society. They want safeguards against the rules for stopping the financing of terror organizations. Special exemptions to guarantee there’d be no blowback on civil society groups. But OSI doesn’t see themselves as NGOs. They position themselves as something with better access and larger capacity than them. Playing a long game of constant pressuring so they can shape the EU in their image over the course of years.

OSI priorities are fundamental rights and rule of law in the EU political mechanism. They try to ensure all member states uphold that, especially on immigration. OSI advocates for thorough and migrant friendly safeguard protocols. The group’s Justice Initiative programs aim toward influencing policy-makers. To that end, the EU encouraged member states to stop irregular migrant detentions. What drives OSI forward is their belief that open society is under attack in Europe. But they say that’s also an opportunity for them to widen their range of political engagement. A chance to recruit more political actors to their cause. The think tanks on one end analyze how the Open Society should advance their agenda. On the opposite side, they’re focusing on public communication refinement.

But that wasn’t enough.

Remember what Glenn Beck said about controlling the airwaves? There it is. Right there. Did any of it work? Even back then? Hell no.

Together that feeds the erosion of cultural identity and the loss of traditionalism.

So was the Open Society. They were trying to make heads or tails of what was what too.

The best way to show this is going over people from both sides. First from the perspective of actions taken by Open Society onto EU officials. The other perspective being vice versa.

Our dear Costanza is only one person of many in this sort of position of leverage and influence.

EEAS is in charge of EU diplomatic missions, intelligence, and crisis management structures. They assist the High Representative in conducting Common Foreign and Security Policy. Which is the EU foreign policy in matters of defense diplomacy, security, and actions. They support his/her capacities as President of the Foreign Affairs Council and Vice-President of the European Commission. EEAS does not propose or put in place policy on their own behalf. Instead, they prepare acts adopted by the High Representative, the European Commission or the Council.

One facet of the External Action Service plays a key role in the Defend Europe situation. Keep in mind. The Open Society wanted to go all the way with “enforcement of debating procedure.” Their outlined plan involves controlling what’s focused on in public discourse. OSF hoped long-term to push new anti-hate speech laws utilizing cross-party political “intergroups.”

It’s as simple as narrowing things down to a single thread. Then following along to see how Soros’s narrative manipulation plays itself out.

But then the SUGGESTED SOURCES this Charter suggests journalists use? There’s a common thread with some of their suggestions.

Cospe is an NGO working on Italian and global initiatives for diversity/rights and equal opportunities for migrants and provides information on racism in Italy and Europe. Says the Rome Charter recommendation sheet. But what does the leaked list of European Elections 2014 projects for the Open Society Initiative say? Oh, it says that same COSPE organization was getting a $46,090 grant for addressing “the issue of insufficient political participation of EU citizens residing in Italy and aims to stimulate their active engagement in the political and public life by mobilizing them to register and vote in the 2014 European Parliament election.”

Allow me to reiterate on this. The Charter wants journalists to use *these* organizations when talking about immigration. It’s their best suggestion, hoping reporters buy into this appeal to authority cop-out.

So let’s take a look at current events and let me show you what this situation looks like, with this NEW lens you have.

It ticked off the U.N. for sure.

Soros connects to European and Global politics without even being a politician himself. He has an acute awareness of the comings and goings of Parliament and their stances on issues. He says he did it in the beginning with the intent of serving the public good. That focus began honing on the merit of a particular project to give money to, and what mattered to Open Society.

It all goes back to the banks. The model of economics at play here is all about controlling the money supply. It goes back to an ancient model by the Phoenicians and brought over to Europe by Venetian bankers. In fact, it may be worthwhile for us to take a step back for a second and go over what happened hundreds of years ago. What happened back then helps clarify things going on today a bit.

The Venetians made religious wars but they looked out for themselves when influencing events on either side of the feud. This war had lasting effects. Venetians realized they couldn’t control the world from a small home territory. Their solution to that was picking everything up and moving somewhere else. So their philosophies, fortunes, and politics went to the Netherlands, England, and France. You can see how the past influenced the present in this respect. The Venetians faded into the background and let other countries duke it out on their behalf.

Some people got rich by betting against the housing market with credit default swaps.

I feel obliged to explain the details of this at least a little bit. I mean you don’t hear stories like that every day.

But this Daily Mail article unintentionally gives one hell of a clue for the financial crisis discussion we’re here to talk about. Howard Rubin was a trader on Wall Street who people say is responsible for Merrill Lynch’s $377 million loss in 1987. He’s alleged to have bought billions of dollars in mortgage bonds without the consent of his bosses. When the market had a bit of a crash, he couldn’t sell those bonds off. But since this is Wall Street we’re talking about? Rubin’s career wasn’t over there. Bear Sterns appointed him as the Senior Manager Director, where he was in charge of Collateralized Mortgage Obligations from ’87 to 1999.

He came out of retirement in 2008 to run a Mortgage-Backed Securities Fund for George Soros.

He made money from the US financial crisis. but he wanted more.

George believed the world needed to change the currency system again because people don’t trust the U.S. dollar the same way they did at the end of WWII. He demanded new international rules be put in place to deal with how financial institutions were handled, what capital controls are supposed to do, and a reorganization of the International Monetary Fund to change the order of importance and methods of operation.

All these people held the same world views as Soros. To be blunt, this was George wanting to rearrange the whole global economic system and financial order. Capitalism was now the big enemy, not Communism. He wanted to reform the International Monetary Fund and the United Nations in a way that boosted China and other countries while taking away power from the United States.

But the US needed to give that power up willingly.

This Bretton Woods Conference meant Soros could move forward with his political maneuvering.

To start grasping the connection here, we need to look at the Merkel plan. This links Soros backing groups that advocate migrant resettlement, to the bank system.

Ankara would stop the smuggling operations in exchange for Germany’s investment to help to improve the living conditions for migrants in Turkey as work was done to resettle Syrians in an “orderly and legal” fashion. The Merkel plan wanted Turkey to take back all irregular migrants that entered Greek territory after March 20th. In return, the EU would reward Ankara financial support for those refugees. and give visa-free travel around the EU for Turkey’s citizens. Finally, the EU member states would resettle these Syrian refugees from Turkey.

“Germany should agree to grant asylum to 500,000 Syrian refugees registered in Turkey over the coming 12 months,” says the Plan’s text.

This deal put the EU in a compromising position. It set up a situation where the Turks could blackmail them for continual funding.

The announcement revealed a new resettlement scheme for 50,000 refugees. Juncker explained they were all trying to figure out options for legal migration. He made it clear one of those was making a more effective EU return policy.

So we got our talking puppets. Then, they’d drop the most important bit of information of all.

“The Commission has set aside €500 million to support Member States’ resettlement efforts.”

That’s how a humanitarian issue becomes a monetary one in the case of European migration. Assuming this is about the 50,000 new refugees mentioned in this piece? That makes their price per person 10000 euro. This link demonstrates how Soros involves himself with the European monetary system. He’s able to have an impact on how many migrants come in. That has a butterfly effect. The immigration factors how much fiat currency they make. Plus, it determines the growth of this Eurozone cottage industry they’re building. A contrived system geared toward asylum seekers and irregular migrants.

It’s to stop people like Soros who want to make the vast and cheap as possible of a Eurozone as they desire. The key to absolute power is controlling the money supply. Governments lead themselves to believe they MUST borrow money from the central banks. Their impression is the debt system depends on people’s continuous capacity to produce. To keep cranking out money. If they stop having kids and the birth rate slows down, economic order falls apart.

“That sounds like replacement migration.” You’d be right.

The bankers of the world want a working-age and consumer-geared population. Individuals who aren’t too stupid to work, but not smart enough to ask questions about how things are run. It’s the reason why we’re put into a system of debt. We have our savings funds depleted, land ownership and inheritance destroyed via taxes and zero interest rates. Being self-sufficient means the banks lose their purpose. It’s all about creating a human ecosystem that demolishes personal spirit. A mankind zombified through stimulation and incentivization. Control over intellectual property is also important to them. It keeps the flow of innovation in the hands of the folks who are “on the same page” as everyone else. This is part of the reason why Gab.ai is facing the pushback that it is.

That’s not an accident. Controlling the population is not only done in a political sense but an economic one too.

Germans have started asking questions about the ECB because they foot the bill. Basically, this German political system (Merkel and old Stasi helpers from GDR) are representatives of the Anglo-American elite. German identitarianism and the Alternative für Deutschland are a political threat because they are the first players since 1949 to openly claim their intent to reassert German sovereignty.

The European Parliament itself is a façade. Designed to allow the European Commission to hide its power level. The bankers of the mid 20th century wanted the same thing. So they ensured the Bank for International Settlements was free of politicians. The similarity is a desire for immunity from prosecution, no worries of oversight. The European Council got tacked on later. Patriotic heads of state felt like they were being tossed to the side in the EU decision-making process.

The Open Society is a massive and complex group using many fronts of manipulation at once. Soros managed to throw the Caucasus and Ukraine into turmoil using the Saakashvili, Aliyev, and Poroshenko mafias to stage revolutions. The neocon takeover of the U.K.s Labour party is another aspect, being fought off by “Corbynistas.”

Money is the greatest driver of these people. We’ve been barking up the wrong tree by assuming it’s an ideological battle they want. Of course, there are the Satanists hiding out that want to see Western culture crumble. The truth is the people in charge of the world are idiots. These bankers that don’t understand how to do anything else than what they’re doing now. It’s not about mixing races. When it comes to immigration they see these people as currency moving around. The import of migrants into Europe props up the Euro.

This comes after Juncker’s remarks that they must hurry Balkan member states into the Schengen borderless area. He is getting his marching orders straight from the BIS.

And the answer to that sort of question is entangled within the web that is the Open Society and George Soros. Thankfully we already went over all that. And luckily for us, Alex is open to sharing things. Stuff that he assumed the public would never be able to make heads or tails of, probably. He likely just thought posting it made him look cool and important.

George’s heightened interests in education outreach certainly present itself with his son too.

Almost Joe-Biden-Friendship-Bracelet tier.

“There’s an opportunity to launch something that actually speaks to what the American Jewish community cares the most about and to show the narrative of what the real American Jewish experience is,” Alex Soros said in an interview.

Add a comment

What is your view?

Send

Related posts:

Two recent goals

Currently I am preparing for two exams at the same time, one is lsat, and the other one is Chinese Bar Exam. Sounds intimitating! But the good side is I have some foundations for both of the tests…

CMO Blog

Paradigm shifts are afoot in the ever-changing digital marketing landscape. “Customer obsession will be the foundation of organizational success in 2018”, a recent Forrester report highlights while…

How I Make Money with Trending with a Hook

As the world becomes more digitally connected, it has become easier for people to make money online. One of the ways to do this is by leveraging trending topics to attract attention and make money…